FEATURED POST

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Image
Update: Robert Pruett was executed by lethal injection on Thursday.
Robert Pruett is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas Thursday. He has never had a chance to live outside a prison as an adult. Taking his life is a senseless wrong that shows how badly the justice system fails juveniles.
Mr. Pruett was 15 years old when he last saw the outside world, after being arrested as an accomplice to a murder committed by his own father. Now 38, having been convicted of a murder while incarcerated, he will be put to death. At a time when the Supreme Court has begun to recognize excessive punishments for juveniles as unjust, Mr. Pruett’s case shows how young lives can be destroyed by a justice system that refuses to give second chances.
Mr. Pruett’s father, Sam Pruett, spent much of Mr. Pruett’s early childhood in prison. Mr. Pruett and his three siblings were raised in various trailer parks by his mother, who he has said used drugs heavily and often struggled to feed the children. Wh…

Bill For Absolute Right To Appeal In Death Penalty Cases Introduced In Lok Sabha

Supreme Court of India
A private member bill, ‘The Constitution (Amendment to Article 134) Bill, 2017’, to ensure natural and unrestricted right to appeal in the Supreme Court in all cases of death penalty, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Friday, by Member of Parliament, Mr. B. Vinod Kumar.

“Through this Bill, my intention is to ensure that every convict, who has been awarded death sentence by the lower court and the High Court, should have the right to move the Supreme Court without any hassle or legal impediment. While the Supreme Court grants the right to appeal in relatively milder and ordinary cases, there is no provision for such rights to be exercised in the context of capital punishment. I believe that this right to appeal in the Apex Court should be natural and drawn from the Constitution itself. This implies that the exercise of this right should not be subjected to the approval or disapproval of the Supreme Court. In the question of life and death, the right to appeal to the Supreme Court should be unrestricted. For this, through this Bill, I propose to amend the Constitution to extend the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to all death penalty cases,” a press note released by Mr. Kumar said.

Article 134 of the Constitution of India, 1950 provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court from any judgment, final order or sentence in a criminal proceeding of a High Court if (a) it has on appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and sentenced him to death or (b) has withdrawn for trial before itself, any case from any Court subordinate to it and has in such trial convicted the accused and sentenced him to death or (c) it certifies that the case is a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court.

Hence, there is, at present, no right of appeal to a death sentence if the accused was concurrently convicted by the courts below. The accused has to only try his chances by invoking the discretionary power of the Supreme Court under Article 136, which allows the Court to dismiss such death sentence cases in limine, i.e. without admitting it for a hearing on merits, or without recording reasons for such dismissal.

The press note then refers to two reports- one submitted by the Death Penalty India Report by National Law University, Delhi, and the other titled report entitled ‘Lethal Lottery’ prepared by Amnesty International and People’s Union for Civil Liberties, to support its contention that several Special Leave Petitions have been dismissed by the Supreme Court in limine.

It further makes reference to the 187th Law Commission Report on Mode of Execution of Death Sentence and Incidental Matters, and the 262nd Law Commission Report on the Death Penalty, which had recommended a statutory right to appeal before the Supreme Court in all death sentence matters. The Bill, therefore, seeks to expand the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, providing mandatory appeals when death sentences are confirmed, and when sentences are enhanced to the death penalty by High Courts.

It is interesting to note that a similar Bill was introduced by Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee in April, 1987. It was however withdrawn on the assurance of its consideration by the then Minister of Law, Mr. H.R. Bharadwaj. The Bill, however, never saw the light of the day. 30 years later, it has now been introduced as a Private Member Bill by Mr. Kumar.

Source: LiveLaw.in, Apoorva Mandhani, March 11, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

New Hampshire: Death penalty repeal may be back on the table

Texas: Montgomery County DA asks governor to stay Anthony Shore's execution

Texas court halts execution to review claims that co-defendant lied at trial

Alabama executes Torrey Twane McNabb

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

The Execution Dock in London was used for more than 400 years to execute pirates, smugglers & mutineers

Hours before execution, Tourniquet Killer granted 90-day stay at DA's request

Papua New Guinea: Death row inmates denied full protection of the law

Ohio parole board rejects Alva Campbell's mercy request

Justices Won’t Review Florida Death-Penalty Cases